<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc = "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/">
	<title>LiveDocs Comments - flash - 9.0 - ActionScriptLangRefV3 - flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html</title>	
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/</link>
		<description>Macromedia LiveDocs - online documentation with user feedback.</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009, Macromedia, Inc.</copyright>
		<dc:date>2009-11-25T21:52:06</dc:date>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html#87341" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html#79289" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html#77998" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html#87341">
		<title>flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html#87341</link>
		<description>Due to browser limitations, custom HTTP request headers are only supported for POST requests, not for GET requests. &lt;br /&gt;---&lt;br /&gt;This restriction will be included in the next version of the Language Reference.</description>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2008-09-02T10:48:50</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html#79289">
		<title>flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html#79289</link>
		<description>In the property detail section it states &quot;An HTTP request header name (such as Content-Type or SOAPAction).&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But would the Content-Type not always be better specified using the contentType property of URLRequest, with which the URLRequestHeader object would be used?</description>
		<dc:creator>flexdeveloper.eu</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2008-01-08T01:51:23</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html#77998">
		<title>flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/net/URLRequestHeader.html#77998</link>
		<description>Why was the Authorization header removed entirely? At the very least, it should have been deprecated for a couple releases before being removed.</description>
		<dc:creator>ALewisohn</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2007-12-05T13:21:02</dc:date>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF>

