<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc = "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/">
	<title>LiveDocs Comments - en_US - Photoshop - 10.0 - WSDD40A386-067B-49e5-9B87-AB311369DAA9.html</title>	
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/</link>
		<description>Macromedia LiveDocs - online documentation with user feedback.</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009, Macromedia, Inc.</copyright>
		<dc:date>2009-11-26T10:27:31</dc:date>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/10.0/WSDD40A386-067B-49e5-9B87-AB311369DAA9.html#90652" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/10.0/WSDD40A386-067B-49e5-9B87-AB311369DAA9.html#90559" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/10.0/WSDD40A386-067B-49e5-9B87-AB311369DAA9.html#90652">
		<title>en_US/Photoshop/10.0/WSDD40A386-067B-49e5-9B87-AB311369DAA9.html</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/10.0/WSDD40A386-067B-49e5-9B87-AB311369DAA9.html#90652</link>
		<description>That greatly depends on the image content. If a similar, unposterized area exists elsewhere in the image, the patch tool could be effective. You may need to experiment with different patch sources to find a seamless match.</description>
		<dc:creator>~mark</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>1 1</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2008-12-12T16:09:48</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/10.0/WSDD40A386-067B-49e5-9B87-AB311369DAA9.html#90559">
		<title>en_US/Photoshop/10.0/WSDD40A386-067B-49e5-9B87-AB311369DAA9.html</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/10.0/WSDD40A386-067B-49e5-9B87-AB311369DAA9.html#90559</link>
		<description>I have been having a problem with an area in a portrait.  The pixels posterize &lt;br /&gt;when I print. Can the patch tool be used to solve that problem? The image is &lt;br /&gt;correctly exposed and I have not altered the file except to apply a very very &lt;br /&gt;small adjustment in curves.</description>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2008-12-09T03:57:40</dc:date>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF>

