<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc = "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/">
	<title>LiveDocs Comments - en_US - InDesign - 5.0 - WS15BD5626-3C31-4174-82F0-3C35A43D28FD.html</title>	
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/</link>
		<description>Macromedia LiveDocs - online documentation with user feedback.</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009, Macromedia, Inc.</copyright>
		<dc:date>2009-11-26T07:00:53</dc:date>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS15BD5626-3C31-4174-82F0-3C35A43D28FD.html#90455" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS15BD5626-3C31-4174-82F0-3C35A43D28FD.html#74672" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS15BD5626-3C31-4174-82F0-3C35A43D28FD.html#90455">
		<title>en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS15BD5626-3C31-4174-82F0-3C35A43D28FD.html</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS15BD5626-3C31-4174-82F0-3C35A43D28FD.html#90455</link>
		<description>Consider TOC Styles as a TOC TEMPLATE and the confusion disappears. &lt;br /&gt;As a suggestion to the UI designers, it is a good idea to NOT overload terms &lt;br /&gt;with multiple meanings</description>
		<dc:creator>jetrudeau</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2008-12-06T05:53:53</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS15BD5626-3C31-4174-82F0-3C35A43D28FD.html#74672">
		<title>en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS15BD5626-3C31-4174-82F0-3C35A43D28FD.html</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS15BD5626-3C31-4174-82F0-3C35A43D28FD.html#74672</link>
		<description>ToC Styles should really really be thought of as *presets* for generating ToC lists. I mention this because the one dialog box uses the term styles three ways within itself, and hence is potentially confusing.</description>
		<dc:creator>Michael Witherell</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2007-10-08T14:45:32</dc:date>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF>

