<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc = "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/">
	<title>LiveDocs Comments - coldfusion - 7 - htmldocs - 00001035.htm</title>	
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/</link>
		<description>Macromedia LiveDocs - online documentation with user feedback.</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009, Macromedia, Inc.</copyright>
		<dc:date>2009-11-26T04:28:16</dc:date>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00001035.htm#52850" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00001035.htm#52850">
		<title>coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00001035.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00001035.htm#52850</link>
		<description>This entry shows use of a CFCOMPONENT NAME attribute, but there is none documented.  And while often one may use an unsupported attribute so that it shows up in GetMetadata, my explorations show that it always return a NAME value (whether specified or not) and it's always a predefined value, not affected by any value provided for NAME.  For those interested in more details, I've just blogged my observations at http://carehart.org/blog/client/index.cfm/2006/9/9/Argument_against_CFCOMPONENT_NAME. Unless comments prove otherwise, it seems that this page should be changed to not show any such use of a NAME attribute.</description>
		<dc:creator>carehart</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2006-09-09T09:42:50</dc:date>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF>

