<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc = "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/">
	<title>LiveDocs Comments - coldfusion - 7 - htmldocs - 00000404.htm</title>	
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/</link>
		<description>Macromedia LiveDocs - online documentation with user feedback.</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009, Macromedia, Inc.</copyright>
		<dc:date>2009-11-26T00:57:11</dc:date>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm#72443" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm#58238" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm#57921" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm#72443">
		<title>coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm#72443</link>
		<description>If you are wanting to convert a string to hex and back try the following:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;String to Hex:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;binaryEncode(toBinary(toBase64(value)),'hex')&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hex to String:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;toString(toBinary(toBase64(binaryDecode(value,'hex'))))</description>
		<dc:creator>SupremeGopher</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2007-08-21T18:43:22</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm#58238">
		<title>coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm#58238</link>
		<description>In response to mattdrayer&lt;br&gt;There is no efficiency difference between the two techniques.&lt;br&gt;I'd guess that we recommend using BinaryEncode because it is a superset of ToBase64, but you can use either.</description>
		<dc:creator>halL</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>1 1</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2006-12-20T07:14:39</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm#57921">
		<title>coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/00000404.htm#57921</link>
		<description>Hi there,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wondering if someone can elaborate on why Adobe recommends the usage of BinaryEncode() over toBase64().  We use tb64() as part of our data transmission algorithm, and a performance gain is always appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Matt</description>
		<dc:creator>mattdrayer</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2006-12-15T14:06:35</dc:date>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF>

