<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc = "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/">
	<title>LiveDocs Comments - coldfusion - 6.1 - htmldocs - tags-pc9.htm</title>	
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/</link>
		<description>Macromedia LiveDocs - online documentation with user feedback.</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009, Macromedia, Inc.</copyright>
		<dc:date>2009-11-25T19:51:43</dc:date>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#40462" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#23491" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#23486" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#13668" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#13663" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#40462">
		<title>coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#40462</link>
		<description>What I am finding hard to believe is that there was a logical reason for changing this and not changing the documentation anywhere except at the bottom of this page.  Even the Coldfusion help files on Dreamweaver 8 have the old examples of using the &lt;cfstoredproc&gt; tag.  The error that is generated from SQL server is obscure and nearly impossible to debug.  This should not be changed at a further date, this should be changed now!</description>
		<dc:creator>codyfox</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2005-10-05T09:47:30</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#23491">
		<title>coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#23491</link>
		<description>Arguments are positional without dbvarname.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you pass the first, second, third, etc. arguments (with cfprocparam) in the correct order - they will match the stored procedure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With CF5 &amp; dbvarname, you could pass arguments out of order if you wanted to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A stored procedure takes 3 arguments: NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With CFMX you must pass these arguments in the same order - NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With CF5 you could pass the zip code first if you wanted to.</description>
		<dc:creator>jrunrandy</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>1 1</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2004-11-04T13:44:34</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#23486">
		<title>coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#23486</link>
		<description>since dbvarname no longer works.. how do I tell the stored procedure what the value is of the variables that it uses?</description>
		<dc:creator>PaulArbouw</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2004-11-04T11:53:28</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#13668">
		<title>coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#13668</link>
		<description>Good catch. We'll fix this in the next CF rev. Thanks.</description>
		<dc:creator>jrunrandy</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>1 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2004-04-30T11:04:51</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#13663">
		<title>coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-pc9.htm#13663</link>
		<description>The documentation for cfprocparam states:&lt;br /&gt;Changed the dbvarname attribute behavior: it is now ignored for all drivers. ColdFusion MX uses JDBC 2.2 and does not support named parameters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The example should be modified not to use it.  The example given came from the CF5 docs.</description>
		<dc:creator>wyntermoonwolf</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2004-04-30T10:54:19</dc:date>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF>

