<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc = "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/">
	<title>LiveDocs Comments - coldfusion - 6 - CFML_Reference - functions-pt1115.htm</title>	
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/</link>
		<description>Macromedia LiveDocs - online documentation with user feedback.</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009, Macromedia, Inc.</copyright>
		<dc:date>2009-11-25T23:01:02</dc:date>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt1115.htm#1507" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt1115.htm#914" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt1115.htm#1507">
		<title>coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt1115.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt1115.htm#1507</link>
		<description>I agree! The ColdFusion documentation is missing simple Before &amp; After examples.  Though, this has been an issue since the beginning of CF documentation, before Macromedia came into the picture.</description>
		<dc:creator>rrcecil</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2003-08-28T12:47:03</dc:date>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt1115.htm#914">
		<title>coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt1115.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt1115.htm#914</link>
		<description>Why is CF documentation full of little apps that demonstrate some aspect of the language instead of just showing what the result of using this tag/function would be.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I.e.  Show me a string before I use HTMLEditFormat and then what it would look like after I run it through the function, rather than a bunch of code that doesn't directly illuminate the tag/function.  I'll tell ya, I find CF docs really useless with regard to this.</description>
		<dc:creator>chris.caron@telelogi</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2003-02-24T05:28:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF>

