<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc = "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/">
	<title>LiveDocs Comments - coldfusion - 6 - CFML_Reference - functions-pt019.htm</title>	
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/</link>
		<description>Macromedia LiveDocs - online documentation with user feedback.</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009, Macromedia, Inc.</copyright>
		<dc:date>2009-11-26T01:14:56</dc:date>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt019.htm#25578" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt019.htm#25578">
		<title>coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt019.htm</title>
		<link>http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6/CFML_Reference/functions-pt019.htm#25578</link>
		<description>These pages are not clearly tagged to differentiate between the 5.0 and the 6.1 documentation pages. I don't know how many times I've come in through Google or such, only to find out later that I was in the 5.0 docs and not the MX docs -- the pages look very similar, and neither expressly state in large friendly letters &quot;5.0&quot; or &quot;MX&quot; or &quot;6.1&quot;. Sure, you can parse the URL, but short of that, coming in through Google and such, you really have no obvious way to know, and no reason to question, that you might not be where you wanted to be.</description>
		<dc:creator>Hutz</dc:creator>
		<dc:type>0 0</dc:type>
		<dc:date>2004-12-17T09:01:01</dc:date>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF>

